Bloody Pit of Horror (1967)
Dir:
Massimo PupilloCountry
of Origin: ItalyRunning
Time: 87 mins
The
demand for Gothics, particularly abroad, had become almost insatiable by the
mid-1960s. Since the opportunities for aspiring Italian filmmakers were based
almost exclusively on how much cash your films brought in, most took to making
films that did well abroad rather than in their native Italy. On these cheaply
made films, shooting schedules were fairly short and they usually at least made
their money back. A lot of directors signed up for these opportunities, some
innovated and others ended up stuck making crappy B-Movies that followed
whatever was trending. This wasn’t a bad thing for longevity, mind you. One of
the reasons Lucio Fulci (director of Zombie Flesh Eaters) worked for so long was how adaptable he was to
different kinds of material, making gialli
(violent murder mysteries) in one decade and gruesome zombie flicks in the
next. Some ended up stuck with contracts to make films they didn’t really want
to make, or at the very least were being required to make films on an almost
production line basis.
This was the reality of the industry at the
time. You made the film quickly and cheaply, or you didn’t work at all. The
problem is of course when you make films like this, getting across any kind of
vision or even any sense of quality and entertainment is challenging. Mario
Bava was good at doing this. Others struggled with the material that they were
given, and others just threw everything but the kitchen sink at a project.
Massimo Pupillo, a workmanlike but highly capable director who had previously
made ‘Terror Creatures from the Grave’ (which I will review) was challenged to
make films for the studio as appealing to audiences as possible, which
basically meant putting in as many boobs and torture scenes as a film could
reasonably allow at the time. The film ended up being credited to its producer
Ralph Zucker because Massimo Pupillo did not - and I quote - ‘give a fuck’.
This bodes well.
The frankly ludicrous plot runs like this; a troupe of models and photographers
for a magazine, are driving through the countryside when they happen upon an
abandoned castle. After exploring, they discover that it isn’t is as abandoned
as they think it is and is in fact the home of a reclusive retired actor called
Travis Anderson, Who clearly doesn’t want them there. He relents, but soon bad
things start happening, usually involving women not wearing very much, or
extraordinarily unconvincing Iron Maidens with rubber spikes.
The main antagonist is played by Mickey Hargitay, former Mr Universe and widow
of Jayne Mansfield who in one of the least surprising twists of all time,
declares himself to be the reborn crimson executioner, whom we saw get executed for his hideous crimes of murdering women with rubber iron maidens in the prologue. His presence in a set of ludicrous red spandex pants, a gold
medallion around his neck and a domino mask, does certainly loom large on the
screen although not for the reasons Pupillo probably intended. Hargitay starts the film with the sort of hammy intensity some muscle movie actors could only dream of, but then something happens and his performance just ramps up and up until he is constantly wearing an expression that
makes him look like he’s trying to pass a kidney stone. All of this while he gets torturing attractive young ladies to death in his cellar o’ S&M and proceeds to
chew up even more scenery. The film does have some wit about it, some of the
banter between models and photographers is quite amusing at times, although it
rapidly wears out its welcome during the middle of a film when you want things
to actually start happening. It’s got some lovely cinematography at times mind you,
mainly because the castle they are in is quite stunning. There were times when
I drifted off just watching the castle - actually the castle itself has more charisma than several
of its leads, particularly the photographer Dermot, which in one of the most meta moments of all time, is played by producer
Ralph Zucker who ended up taking directorial credit for this film (and how proud he must have been). The greatest spider robot in the world
The film is utterly daft, an exercise in lurid, melodramatic nonsense that is
never anything but ridiculous. A particular standout is a ludicrous scene in
which one of the models is attached to a giant spider’s web, with crossbows
around her prepared to fire anyone some just touches any of the strings, all
while a poisonous mechanical spider is zooming along the ceiling towards her.
If this sounds awesome, I can assure you it absolutely is not.
I still couldn’t
tell you if the spider is supposed to be real or not, because as either a
living or a mechanical spider, it still looks like crap. Apparently Pupillo was
trying to make the most of the subject matter he had, struggling to introduce some
sexual symbolism here and there, but unfortunately it is just a film that is
just the sum of its parts. When you have a film in which most of the punch-ups
involve people throwing punches that never even connect quite visibly on screen,
your thoughts aren’t really on the inherent symbolism. When the crimson
executioner it is on screen, you’re more startled by his terrifying bulge than
anything else. Thank god it’s not in 3D..It is a fairly enjoyable watch provided you turn your brain off. This is in spite of a middle section that drags
and the utter hamminess of the whole enterprise. It is in glorious Eastman
colour and it is quite amusing, whether intentionally or not. It’s not really
bad enough for a bad film night, and it’s not exactly good enough to be
considered a classic of the genre either, even if you are stretching the
definition of classic to its absolute furthest extent. It has its fans, but it’s best regarded as a perfect crystallisation of all the excesses of the late 1960s.
No comments:
Post a Comment